Structuralism, Mathematical
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Structuralism is a view about the subject matter of mathematics according to which what matters are structural relationships in abstraction from the intrinsic nature of the related objects. Mathematics is seen as the free exploration of structural possibilities, primarily through creative concept formation, postulation, and deduction. The items making up any particular system exemplifying the structure in question are of no importance; all that matters is that they satisfy certain general conditions—typically spelled out in axioms defining the structure or structures of interest—characteristic of the branch of mathematics in question. Thus, in the basic case of arithmetic, the famous " axioms " of Richard Dedekind (taken over by Giuseppe Peano, as he acknowledged) were conditions in a definition of a " simply infinite system " , with an initial item, each item having a unique next one, no two with the same next one, and all items finitely many steps from the initial one. (The latter condition is guaranteed by the axiom of mathematical induction.) All such systems are structurally identical, and, in a sense to be made more precise, the shared structure is what mathematics investigates. (In other cases, multiple structures are allowed, as in abstract algebra with its many groups, rings, fields, and so forth.) This structuralist view of arithmetic thus contrasts with the absolutist view, associated with Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell, that natural numbers must in fact be certain definite objects, namely classes of equinumerous concepts or classes. Historically, structuralism can be traced to nineteenth century developments, including the rise of the axiomatic method and of non-Euclidean geometries leading to the recognition of multiple abstract spaces independent of physical space and of spatial intuition. (David Hilbert, whose work in the foundations of geometry (1899) was
منابع مشابه
Abstract Algebra, Mathematical Structuralism and Semiotics
Algebra, Mathematical Structuralism and
متن کاملAn Epistemic Structuralist Account
ii This thesis aims to explain the nature and justification of mathematical knowledge using an epistemic version of mathematical structuralism, that is a hybrid of Aristotelian structuralism and Hellman’s modal structuralism. Structuralism, the theory that mathematical entities are recurring structures or patterns, has become an increasingly prominent theory of mathematical ontology in the late...
متن کاملHow Structuralism Can Solve the ‘Access’ Problem1
According to mathematical structuralism, the subject matter of mathematics is not the study of mathematical objects, but of mathematical structures. By moving away from objects, the structuralist claims to be in a position to solve the ‘access’ problem: structuralism explains the possibility of mathematical knowledge without requiring any access to mathematical objects. Fraser MacBride has chal...
متن کاملHow are Mathematical Objects Constituted? A Structuralist Answer
In my view, structuralism as presented by Shapiro (1991, 1997), Resnik (1991), and elsewhere offers the most plausible philosophy of mathematics: Mathematics is about structures, indeed it is the science of pure structures. Structures have no mysterious ontological status, and hence mathematics is not ontologically mysterious, either. Again, it is no mystery how we can acquire knowledge about s...
متن کاملFoundations for Mathematical Structuralism∗
We investigate the form of mathematical structuralism that acknowledges the existence of structures and their distinctive structural elements. This form of structuralism has been subject to criticisms recently, and our view is that the problems raised are resolved by proper, mathematics-free theoretical foundations. Starting with an axiomatic theory of abstract objects, we identify a mathematic...
متن کاملStructuralism and Meta-Mathematics
The debate on structuralism in the philosophy of mathematics has brought into focus a question about the status of meta-mathematics. It has been raised by Stewart Shapiro in (Shapiro, 2005), where he compares the ongoing discussion on structuralism in category theory to the Frege-Hilbert controversy on axiomatic systems. Shapiro outlines an answer according to which meta-mathematics is understo...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005